Hospitals / MT

GREAT FALLS CLINIC HOSPITAL

GREAT FALLS, MT

Ranks 16 of 21 scanned hospitals in MT. Ranks 1443 of 2203 scanned nationally.

Claim this hospital
Has warnings

This file has one or more warnings, worth a look, but nothing that blocks a good-faith attestation on its own.

88/100
156,044 line items scanned
Blockers
0
Warnings
2
Info
0

Source: https://apim.services.craneware.com/api-pricing-transparency/api/public/cc2262cf9e8e517c05fef8b1434c3119/charges/mrf

Format: csv-wide · Schema v3.0 · Engine v0.2.7 · 10/28/2026, 1:14:17 PM

Automated analysis of the public file, using the current MRF Preflight ruleset. Not legal advice. Hospitals may re-scan at any time.

L2: Completeness and plausibility

No placeholder values in price or payer fields

Warning · HPT-L2-014

Values like 999999999, 'N/A', or an empty payer name are common placeholders hospitals leave in when a real number wasn't ready. They pass schema validation but carry no real pricing information.

135824 rows contain a placeholder value instead of real data.

Citation: CMS Hospital Price Transparency FAQ, data completeness guidance

Remediation: Replace placeholder values with the real negotiated rate, or omit the row if the rate genuinely doesn't exist for that payer/plan.

Affects 135,824 row(s).

L3: Discoverability compliance

MRF filename follows the CMS naming convention

Warning · HPT-L3-002

CMS expects the MRF filename to follow <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.<ext>. A non-conforming filename makes the file harder for automated tools (including CMS's own review process) to identify.

Filename "mrf" doesn't match <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.<ext>.

Citation: 45 CFR 180.50(b)(1)(i) — file naming convention

Remediation: Rename the file to <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.csv (or .json), using the hospital's EIN with no dashes.

GREAT FALLS CLINIC HOSPITAL: price transparency scorecard: MRF Preflight