Hospitals / TN

JACKSON-MADISON COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL

JACKSON, TN

Ranks 6 of 8 scanned hospitals in TN. Ranks 636 of 993 scanned nationally.

Has blockers

This file has one or more blockers, issues that should be resolved before signing the attestation.

68/100
84,820 line items scanned
Blockers
1
Warnings
2
Info
0

Source: https://www.wth.org/wp-content/uploads/standard-charges/62-6010402_JH_standard_Charges.csv

Format: csv-tall · Schema v3.0 · Engine v0.2.3 · 10/3/2026, 12:23:11 PM

Automated analysis of the public file, using the current MRF Preflight ruleset. Not legal advice. Hospitals may re-scan at any time.

L1: Schema conformance

Required fields present on every line item

Blocker · HPT-L1-001

Every standard charge line item must include a description, at least one billing code and code type, a care setting, and at least one standard charge (gross charge, discounted cash price, or a payer-specific negotiated dollar amount, percentage, or algorithm). Rows missing any of these can't be matched to a real service or priced.

40 of 84820 rows are missing a required field.

Citation: 45 CFR 180.50(b); CMS v3.0.0 CSV/JSON data dictionary, required-field list

Remediation: Fill in the description, code, code|type, and setting for every row, and make sure every row carries at least one standard charge, before republishing.

Affects 40 row(s).

L2: Completeness and plausibility

No placeholder values in price or payer fields

Warning · HPT-L2-014

Values like 999999999, 'N/A', or an empty payer name are common placeholders hospitals leave in when a real number wasn't ready. They pass schema validation but carry no real pricing information.

13890 rows contain a placeholder value instead of real data.

Citation: CMS Hospital Price Transparency FAQ, data completeness guidance

Remediation: Replace placeholder values with the real negotiated rate, or omit the row if the rate genuinely doesn't exist for that payer/plan.

Affects 13,890 row(s).

L3: Discoverability compliance

MRF filename follows the CMS naming convention

Warning · HPT-L3-002

CMS expects the MRF filename to follow <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.<ext>. A non-conforming filename makes the file harder for automated tools (including CMS's own review process) to identify.

Filename "62-6010402_JH_standard_Charges.csv" doesn't match <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.<ext>.

Citation: 45 CFR 180.50(b)(1)(i) — file naming convention

Remediation: Rename the file to <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.csv (or .json), using the hospital's EIN with no dashes.

1 blocker found in this file

The Attestation Evidence Packet documents every finding above with the exact file location, what was checked, and when — as a dated PDF with a SHA-256 hash, so what was true at generation time stays provable after the file changes. One hospital, one-time.