UVA HEALTH PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER
MANASSAS, VA
Ranks 31 of 51 scanned hospitals in VA. Ranks 1860 of 2446 scanned nationally.
Insurer rates vs. nearby hospitals
We compared the commercial rates in UVA HEALTH PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER's published price file with the same insurers' commercial rates at hospitals within 120 miles, across 7 common services (imaging, lab tests and emergency visits). One insurer pays UVA HEALTH PRINCE WILLIAM MEDICAL CENTER below the nearby median on most of the services compared.
| Insurer | Below the nearby median |
|---|---|
| UnitedHealthcare | all of 6 services |
| Cigna | 1 of 7 services |
The full benchmark lists every service for every insurer: this hospital's rate, the nearby 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile, and each nearby hospital's published rate with a link to its source file, so your team can check every number before a contract negotiation.
Source: each hospital's own machine-readable file published under 45 CFR 180 (this hospital's file last updated 2026-03-24). Commercial plans only; Medicare Advantage and Medicaid plans are excluded. Where a file lists several plans for one insurer, we use the median of those plans. Hospitals sharing this hospital's tax ID are not counted as peers. Not legal or contracting advice.
This file has one or more blockers, issues that should be resolved before signing the attestation.
- Blockers
- 1
- Warnings
- 2
- Info
- 0
Source: https://brand.uvahealth.com/api/asset/eyJjbGllbnRJZCI6bnVsbCwiaWQiOjE2NDEwMywidGltZXN0YW1wIjoxNzkyNTIzNzc0LCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoxNzkyNTIwODY1fQ:uva-health:0Fy3YGWShIQI0wR5BcGDh7NMamjELnuHmOBFEzYjiYQ/download
Format: csv-tall · Schema v3.0 · Engine v0.2.7 · 10/31/2026, 8:49:53 PM
Automated analysis of the public file, using the current MRF Preflight ruleset. Not legal advice. Hospitals may re-scan at any time.
L2: Completeness and plausibility
Percentile allowed amounts are internally consistent
Blocker · HPT-L2-020Where median, 10th percentile, and 90th percentile allowed amounts are reported, the 10th percentile must be less than or equal to the median, which must be less than or equal to the 90th percentile, and the count of amounts behind the calculation must be greater than zero.
2 rows have out-of-order percentiles or a count CMS does not allow.
Citation: CY2026 OPPS final rule, 45 CFR 180.50(b)(4) — median/10th/90th percentile allowed amounts + count
Remediation: Recompute the percentile fields from the underlying remittance data so 10th <= median <= 90th, and ensure count reflects the number of amounts behind the calculation.
Affects 2 row(s).
No placeholder values in price or payer fields
Warning · HPT-L2-014Values like 999999999, 'N/A', or an empty payer name are common placeholders hospitals leave in when a real number wasn't ready. They pass schema validation but carry no real pricing information.
101072 rows contain a placeholder value instead of real data.
Citation: CMS Hospital Price Transparency FAQ, data completeness guidance
Remediation: Replace placeholder values with the real negotiated rate, or omit the row if the rate genuinely doesn't exist for that payer/plan.
Affects 101,072 row(s).
L3: Discoverability compliance
MRF filename follows the CMS naming convention
Warning · HPT-L3-002CMS expects the MRF filename to follow <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.<ext>. A non-conforming filename makes the file harder for automated tools (including CMS's own review process) to identify.
Filename "download" doesn't match <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.<ext>.
Citation: 45 CFR 180.50(b)(1)(i) — file naming convention
Remediation: Rename the file to <ein>_<hospital-name>_standardcharges.csv (or .json), using the hospital's EIN with no dashes.
1 blocker found in this file
The Attestation Evidence Packet documents every finding above with the exact file location, what was checked, and when — as a dated PDF with a SHA-256 hash, so what was true at generation time stays provable after the file changes. One hospital, one-time.